Open Letter from Myanmar/Burma civil society to the Member States of the United Nations Human Rights Council regarding the situation of human rights in Myanmar/Burma

    Member States
    United Nations Human Rights Council
    Palais des Nations
    CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
    We, a diverse range of civil society organizations from Myanmar/Burma, are writing to you in advance of the upcoming 25th regular session in Geneva to express our serious concerns about the lack of progress made regarding the situation of human rights in Myanmar/Burma, and to urge the Council to maintain the resolution on the situation of human rights in Myanmar/Burma under agenda item 4 of the Council in its upcoming session. It is vital to maintain pressure on the Myanmar/Burma government to ensure that it continues with its reforms, and addresses grave ongoing issues such as constitutional reform, inter-communal violence, the lack of rule of law, repressive legislation, land confiscation and gross human rights abuses in ethnic areas as a matter of extreme urgency.
    These concerns were also raised by the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, Tomás Ojea Quintana, at the conclusion of his final mission to Myanmar/Burma. His end-of-mission statement, issued at Rangoon International Airport on 19 February, provides a thematic summary of the most pressing human rights issues that Myanmar/Burma currently faces.
    Special Rapporteur Quintana’s statement highlights two salient points. First, the human rights situation in Myanmar/Burma is still very serious, with little or no progress made in some areas. As Special Rapporteur Quintana says: “For the time being, the military retains a prevailing role in the life and institutions of Myanmar. State institutions in general remain unaccountable and the judiciary is not yet functioning as an independent branch of Government. Moreover, the rule of law cannot yet be said to exist in Myanmar. Tackling the situation in Rakhine State represents a particular challenge which, if left unaddressed, could jeopardize the entire reform process. A critical challenge will be to secure ceasefire and political agreements with ethnic minority groups, so that Myanmar can finally transform into a peaceful multi-ethnic and multi-religious society.” In other areas, such as “the release of prisoners of conscience, the opening up of space for freedom of expression, the development of political freedoms, and important progress in securing an end to fighting in the ethnic border areas,” reforms are in grave danger of backsliding.
    Second, it is clear that the Special Rapporteur plays a vital role in monitoring what is happening inside Myanmar/Burma, presenting his findings to the Council and submitting recommendations for action. It is disingenuous to make the argument that Myanmar/Burma no longer requires a Special Rapporteur mandate based only on incomplete reforms in certain areas, such as the release of political prisoners. Set among the spread of unsavory issues on Myanmar’s/Burma’s plate, such reforms are little more than garnish intended to make Myanmar/Burma palatable to the international community.
    Furthermore, not only is a Special Rapporteur still entirely necessary; one with a full monitoring mandate under agenda item 4 of the Council is needed to ensure continuing monitoring and reporting to the Council on human rights developments in Myanmar/Burma, as demonstrated by Special Rapporteur Quintana’s statement and the Myanmar/Burma government’s repeated failure to comply with the Council’s recommendations.
    By the same token, the need for the establishment of a UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) presence in Myanmar/Burma is indicated by the litany of human rights concerns, and anything less than an office with a full promotion and protection mandate cannot currently be justified. We understand that the UN and the Myanmar/Burma government are currently at an impasse regarding the establishment of an OHCHR office, with the Myanmar/Burma government unwilling to accept an office with a full mandate. We further understand that the Myanmar/Burma government is trying to negotiate, as part of such discussions, a reduction in the mandate of the Special Rapporteur – to a mandate under agenda item 10 which entails only “technical cooperation” – or the abolition of the Special Rapporteur mandate altogether.
    Direct action by the UN and international institutions is essential, and your commitment to achieve peace, democracy, human rights, equality and rule of law for all people of Myanmar/Burma is crucial. Failure to do so will only perpetuate long-standing human rights abuses, entrenched impunity, armed conflicts, and political and humanitarian crises faced by the people of Myanmar/Burma. We thank you for considering our requests in the upcoming Council session.
    Yours sincerely,
    Burma Partnership

    Target Institution

    Government of Myanmar/Burma

    Organisation/s Involved

    1. Action Committee for Democracy Development
    2. All Kachin Students and Youth Union (AKSYU)
    3. ALTSEAN-Burma
    4. Arakan Observer Group
    5. ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR)
    6. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
    7. Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP)
    8. Association Suisse-Birmanie
    9. Back Pack Health Worker Team (BPHWT)
    10. Burma Action Ireland
    11. Burma Campaign Australia
    12. Burma Campaign UK
    13. Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
    14. Burma Study Center
    15. Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW)
    16. Dignity International
    17. Equality Myanmar
    18. Federation of Student’s Union Organization Committee
    19. Fortify Rights
    20. Forum for Democracy in Burma (FDB)
    21. Free Burma Campaign (South Africa)
    22. Hong Kong Coalition for a Free Burma
    23. Human Resource Development Program (HRDP)
    24. Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM)
    25. Info Birmanie (France)
    26. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
    27. Kachin Women’s Association Thailand (KWAT)
    28. Karen Environmental and Social Action Network (KESAN)
    29. Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG)
    30. Karenni Civil Societies Network (KCSN)
    31. Karen Women Empowerment Group (KWEG)
    32. Karen Women Organization (KWO)
    33. Mae Tao Clinic (MTC)
    34. Network for Democracy and Development (NDD)
    35. Pa-Oh Youth Organization (PYO)
    36. Pax Romana ICMICA
    37. People’s Forum on Burma (Japan)
    38. Rohingya Arakanese Refugee Committee (RARC), Malaysia
    39. Rohingya Youth Development Forum (RYDF), Arakan-Burma
    40. Students and Youth Congress of Burma (SYCB)
    41. Tavoy Women’s Union (TWU)
    42. Tavoy Youth Organization (TYO)
    43. United Lahu Youth Organization (ULYO)
    44. Women’s League of Burma (WLB)
    45. Yangon People Service Network