After Conviction, Civil Society Demands Independent Inquiry into Murder of Kem Ley [Joint Statement]


    In light of serious shortcomings with regards to the responsibility of the court to critically examine the evidence before it, and in order to ensure conformity with international best practices, we, the undersigned, call for the establishment of an independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate Dr. Kem Ley’s death.

    March 23, 2017 – Three weeks after a four-hour trial hearing, the Phnom Penh Municipal Court today convicted Oeuth Ang – otherwise known as ‘Chuob Samlab’ – of the premeditated murder of prominent political analyst Dr. Kem Ley as well as illegal possession of a weapon under Articles 200 and 490 of Cambodia’s Criminal Code. Presiding judge Leang Samnat sentenced Oeuth Ang to life imprisonment.

    Despite compelling evidence that Oeuth Ang was the gunman who shot and killed Dr. Kem Ley, the lack of transparency in the investigation of Kem Ley’s death, the brevity of the trial proceedings, and the failure to fully investigate motive, potential accomplices and the circumstances of Oeuth Ang’s arrest, raise serious concerns about the adequacy of this criminal process. In light of the inadequacies in the investigation into Dr. Kem Ley’s death, as well as in the trial proceedings, we, the undersigned civil society organizations, call for the establishment of an independent Commission of Inquiry into the circumstances of his murder, in accordance with international best practices.

    Dr. Kem Ley was shot dead on the morning of Sunday 10 July in a petrol station café in the middle of Phnom Penh, where he was known to often have morning coffee. Oeuth Ang was arrested shortly after the shooting, about two kilometers from the murder scene, and charged with premeditated murder on 12 July. Upon his initial arrest, he gave his name as ‘Chuob Samlab’, which translates in English as ‘Meet Kill’, and confessed to the murder. He claimed it was over an unpaid debt of $3,000 – an allegation that has been widely rejected by both Dr. Kem Ley’s family and Oeuth Ang’s wife. The Ministry of Interior also publicly stated in December through a spokesperson that it, too, did not believe this was plausible. Nevertheless, the investigation into Dr. Kem Ley’s murder drew to a close in less than six months after the killing with Oeuth Ang the sole suspect.

    ‘Lack of independent investigations feeds into the rampant impunity inherent in Cambodia’s justice system. It is unsurprising that this engenders continuing distrust in Cambodia’s institutions,’ said Chak Sopheap, Executive Director of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR).

    Throughout Oeuth Ang’s four-hour trial on 1 March, he falsely maintained that his name was Chuob Samlab, although the Court concluded that both were the same person. During testimony, he also reiterated his claim that he had shot Dr. Kem Ley over the unpaid debt. This motive was not challenged by the trial judges – who appeared satisfied to accept Oeuth Ang as the sole perpetrator – despite its total lack of plausibility and the questionable credibility of Ang’s testimony. Statements by Oeuth Ang’s family and friends in the months preceding the trial cast further doubt on this explanation. The judgment given today failed to make any references to the debt, despite Oeuth Ang’s repeated claim that this was the sole motivation for the killing.

    The trial showed extracts of CCTV footage taken from the Caltex petrol station during and after the shooting, but not of the period immediately before it. Further footage that was shown at the trial showed Oeuth Ang running down a pavement on Mao Tse Tung boulevard after the shooting, followed by a motorbike carrying a man openly carrying a rifle. At one point in the footage, another large motorbike – carrying the insignia of the National Police – changes direction to follow Oeuth Ang as well. Oeuth Ang briefly jumps on this motorbike, before dismounting and continuing to run down the street. This bizarre behavior remains without credible explanation.

    Oeuth Ang testified that he had met Dr. Kem Ley only once at a restaurant in Phnom Penh, arranged by an acquaintance from Thailand, who he named as ‘Pou Lis’, at which he gave Kem Ley $3,000. Oueth Ang also claimed that he had bought the gun used to shoot Dr. Kem Ley in Thailand from a Thai national called ‘Chak’. Neither man was called as a witness, although they are reported to be under investigation in relation to the case.

    A series of witnesses, mostly from the police, read out brief witness statements. There was no comprehensive cross-examination.

    ‘A court is supposed to be inquisitive in order to uncover the truth. But the evidence showed, and the footage the prosecution chose not to show, left us with more questions than answers, which the court did not inquire into,’ said Moeun Tola, Director of the Center for Alliance of Labour and Human Rights (CENTRAL).

    ‘This investigation was inadequate and the trial was a charade. We demand an independent inquiry with international assistance to investigate Dr. Kem Ley’s death, which will be the only way to achieve justice for his family and friends,’ said Naly Pilorge, Deputy Director for Advocacy at the Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO).

    The obligation to carry out an effective investigation, as well as to ensure that all perpetrators are brought to justice, is a crucial element of the state’s obligation to respect the right to life, enshrined in Article 32 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia, Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Cambodia is a party. In light of serious shortcomings with regards to the responsibility of the court to critically examine the evidence before it, and in order to ensure conformity with international best practices, we, the undersigned, call for the establishment of an independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate Dr. Kem Ley’s death. This Commission should be comprised of international experts from outside Cambodia, and have access to all available evidence, including all available CCTV footage. Given the inadequacies in the original investigation and trial, as described above, an independent Commission of Inquiry is now the only means by which to safeguard the independence and transparency of the investigation, comply with Cambodia’s obligation to fully investigate possible breaches of the right to life, and ultimately to find justice for the family of Dr. Kem Ley.

    Source :

    Organisation/s Involved

    This statement is endorsed by:

    1. 92 Community
    2. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
    3. Areng Valley Community
    4. Banteay Srey Community
    5. Beung Pram Land Community
    6. Boeung Kak Community
    7. Boeung Trabek Community
    8. Borei Keila Community
    9. Buddhism for Peace Organization (BPO)
    10. Building and Woodworker Trades Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
    11. Building Community Voice (BCV)
    12. CamASEAN Youth
    13. Cambodian Development People Life Association
    14. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
    15. Cambodian Domestic Workers Network (CDWN)
    16. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
    17. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
    18. Cambodian Independent Civil-Servants Association (CICA)
    19. Cambodian Independent Teachers Association (CITA)
    20. Cambodian League for the Promotion & Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
    21. Cambodian Labour Confederation (CLC)
    22. Cambodian Tourism and Service Workers Federation (CTSWF)
    23. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
    24. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
    25. Cheko Community
    26. Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers Domestic Union (C.CAWDU)
    27. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability
    28. Coalition of Cambodian Farmer Community (CCFC)
    29. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
    30. Farmer Association for Peace and Development (FAPD)
    31. Former Boeung Kak Women Network Community
    32. Highlander Association
    33. Housing Rights Task Force (HRTF)
    34. IFEX
    35. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
    36. Independent Monk Network for Social Justice
    37. Indigenous Youth at Brome Commune, Preah Vihear Province
    38. Indradevi Association
    39. Khmer Youth Association (KYA)
    40. Koh Sralao Community
    41. Land Community, I Village Preah Sihanouk Province
    42. LICADHO Canada
    43. Lor Peang Community
    44. Mother Nature
    45. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
    46. People’s Centre for Development and Peace
    47. Phnom Bat Community
    48. Phum 21 Community
    49. Phum 22 Community
    50. Phum 23 Community
    51. Ponlok Khmer
    52. Prek Takung Community
    53. Prek Tanou
    54. Prey Lang Community
    55. Preah Vihear Indigenous Community Network
    56. Railway Community
    57. Samaky 4 Community
    58. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
    59. SOS International Airport Community
    60. Thmor Kol Community (TK)
    61. Toul Sangke B Community
    62. Toul Rada Community
    63. Trapaing Anhchanh Thmey Community
    64. Tumnop II Community
    65. Wat Than Youth and Monk Network
    66. The Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)